Heisey, among other companies that made fine quality “elegant” glassware, employed the process of manual pressing to produce elegant glassware entirely by hand. Evidence of the mold is rarely seen on these pieces and they’re not traditional examples of molded glass.
How Was Pressed Glass Finished?
Collectible pieces of both hand- and machine-pressed glass were often finished by a method called fire polishing by elegant glass companies. This technique required applying a direct flame to give fire-polished (a term often used in marketing glassware when it was new) pieces an even, glossy finish. This finishing process is sometimes referred to as glazing as well. Pieces with a more uneven texture and less of a gleam to the finish were not fire-polished. Most of what falls into the pressed glass category is not finished in this way.
Pattern Glass vs. Pressed Glass
Sometimes the term pressed glass is used generically by antique dealers and novice collectors to describe pattern glass. While this type of glass is a form of pressed glass due to the way it was manufactured, the terms used by avid collectors to describe it are most often Early American Pattern Glass or simply pattern glass. Early American Pattern Glass (often abbreviated EAPG in collecting circles) was made using molds of one or more parts depending on the size of the piece being produced, and molten glass was pressed into the molds. The molds could be quite intricate when used to make figural knobs and patterns featuring animals, fruit, and other elaborate motifs. Like Depression glass (although EAPG dates largely to the late 1800s while Depression glass didn’t debut until the late 1920s), these pieces were a part of everyday glassware sets when they were new and can contain mold marks, although some of the busier patterns hide them quite well.
Similarities to Cut Glass
Yes, some pressed glass items mimic cut glass and were made as a cheaper alternative to their more labor-intensive and costly counterparts. One company associated with this type of product is the Imperial Glass Company. Imperial used the Nucut (pronounced “new cut”) mark on many of its pressed glass pieces that simulate cut glass. But when examined in comparison, the “cuts” on pressed glass pieces do not have the sharp feel to them found when running a finger across a piece of cut glass as if checking glassware for damage. And although the patterns are intricate, sometimes mold lines are present in these pieces as well.
How to Tell the Difference
The first thing to look for is the presence of a pontil mark on the bottom of the piece. Whether it’s rough where the glass making rod was broken off, just a polished bump, or smoothed out to form an oval or round indention, blown glass will have some type of pontil mark present. Molded or pressed glass will not have a pontil mark on the bottom. Instead, look for seams present to indicate that a mold was used in the manufacture, as mentioned above. The mold seams are usually found on the sides of the piece where a mold would have fit together during production. Rough mold seams often indicate lesser quality glass, but that doesn’t mean those pieces are not collectible. Many types of molded glass, including milk glass, EAPG, and Depression glass, along with many other types are readily found today and they do have a following among collectors.